アムステルダム、肉と化石燃料の広告を公共の場で使用禁止

#Tech

アムステルダム、肉と化石燃料の広告を公共の場で使用禁止

アムステルダム市は、世界初の取り組みとして、肉製品や化石燃料関連の公共広告を全面的に禁止しました。

ビルの看板や駅の広告スペースから、これらの広告が撤去され、代わりに博物館やコンサートのプロモーションが行われるようになりました。

市当局は、2050年までのカーボンニュートラル達成や肉の消費量削減といった環境目標の一環としてこの措置を講じました。

専門家は、公共広告の削減が食習慣に影響を与える可能性に期待を寄せています。

同様の動きは、すでにオランダ国内の他の都市や世界各地で広がりを見せています。

オランダのアムステルダムが、世界で初めて公共の場における肉製品や化石燃料関連の広告を全面的に禁止しました。5月1日より、バス停や地下鉄の駅など街中に設置された看板から、ハンバーガーやガソリン車、航空会社の広告が撤去されています。この動きは、市の環境目標達成に向けた強力なメッセージとして注目されています。

環境目標と街の景観改革

この禁止措置は、アムステルダム市が掲げる「2050年までのカーボンニュートラル達成」という目標と密接に関わっています。さらに、市民の肉消費量を同期間で半減させるという目標も設定されています。市の政治家たちは、街の景観を地域の環境目標と一致させるためだと説明しています。

推進派は、公共空間の広告を、市の掲げる環境政策と矛盾するような内容で利用することへの疑問を呈しています。肉や化石燃料の広告を排除することで、安価な肉や高炭素な旅行が「当たり前のライフスタイル」として見られるのを防ぎ、消費者の選択肢に影響を与える狙いがあるとのことです。

「タバコ化」を目指す政策の意図

この政策の背景には、広告が社会の「常識」を形成するという考え方があります。環境活動家は、肉の広告を排除することは、かつてタバコ広告が社会に浸透していた状況を覆す「タバコ化」のような試みだと指摘しています。

つまり、公共の場で「殺された動物」のイメージが常態化している状態を変えたいという意図があるようです。肉の広告を、個人の食の選択という問題から、地球規模の「気候変動問題」へと位置づけ直すことが、この禁止措置の重要な政治的メッセージと見られています。

業界の反発と今後の課題

一方で、業界からは強い反発が出ています。オランダ肉類協会は、この動きを「消費者の行動に不必要に影響を与える方法」だと批判し、肉は「必須栄養素を提供する」として広告の可視性を主張しています。

また、旅行代理店側も、航空旅行を含む休暇の広告禁止は企業の商業的自由に対する過度な制限だと主張しています。この取り組みは、オランダ国内だけでなく、エディンバラやストックホルムなど世界各地の都市でも進められている潮流の一部であり、今後、デジタル広告への影響が焦点となる見通しです。

まとめ

アムステルダムの取り組みは、都市の景観を通じて社会の価値観を変えようとする試みとして注目されています。しかし、物理的な街中での規制が、オンラインでの消費行動にどれほどの変化をもたらすのか、今後の実効性が問われることになりそうです。

原文の冒頭を表示(英語・3段落のみ)

11 hours agoAnna HolliganBusiness reporter, AmsterdamBBCAdvertisements for meat products, such as beef burgers, have disappeared from Amsterdam's streetsAmsterdam has become the world's first capital city to ban public advertisements for both meat and fossil fuel products. Since 1 May, adverts for burgers, petrol cars and airlines have been stripped from billboards, tram shelters, and metro stations.At one of the city's busiest tram stops, adjacent to a grassy roundabout bursting with vibrant yellow daffodils and orange tulips, the poster advertising landscape has changed.They now promote the Rijksmuseum, the national museum of the Netherlands, and a piano concert. Until last week it was chicken nuggets, SUVs and low-budget holidays.Politicians in the city say the move is about bringing Amsterdam's streetscape into line with the local government's own environmental targets.These aim for the Dutch capital to become carbon neutral by 2050, and for local people to halve their meat consumption over the same period."The climate crisis is very urgent," says Anneke Veenhoff from the GreenLeft Party. "I mean, if you want to be leading in climate policies and you rent out your walls to exactly the opposite, then what are you doing?"Most people don't understand why the municipality should make money out of renting our public space with something that we are actively having policies against."This view is echoed by Anke Bakker, who is Amsterdam group leader for a Dutch political party that focuses on animal rights – Party for the Animals.She instigated the new restrictions, and rejects accusations of them being nanny state."Everybody can just make their own decisions, but actually we are trying to get the big companies not to tell us all the time what we need to eat and buy," says Bakker."In a way, we're giving people more freedom because they can make their own choice, right?"Removing that constant visual nudge, she says, both reduces impulse buying, and signals that cheap meat and fossil heavy travel are no longer aspirational lifestyle choices.Meat was a relatively small slice of Amsterdam's outdoor advertising market – accounting for an estimated 0.1% of ad spend, compared with roughly 4% for fossil related products.The advertising was instead dominated by the likes of clothing brands, movie posters, and mobile phones.But politically the ban sends a message. Grouping meat with flights, cruises and petrol and diesel cars reframes it from a purely private dietary choice to a climate issue.Local politicians Anneke Veenhoff (left) and Anke Bakker say the ban was neededUnsurprisingly, the Dutch Meat Association, which represents the industry, is unhappy at the move, which it calls "an undesirable way to influence consumer behaviour". It adds that meat "delivers essential nutrients and should remain visible and accessible to consumers".Meanwhile, the Dutch Association of Travel Agents and Tour Operators says that the ban on advertising holidays that include air travel is a disproportionate curb on companies' commercial freedom.For activists like lawyer Hannah Prins and her environmental organisation Advocates for the Future, which worked closely with campaign group Fossil-Free Advertising, the ban on meat advertising is a deliberate attempt to create a "tobacco moment" for high carbon food."Because if I look now back at like old pictures, you have Johan Cruyff," says Prins. "The famous Dutch footballer."He would be in advertisements for tobacco. That used to be normal. He died of lung cancer."That you were allowed to smoke on the train, on restaurants. For me, that's like, whoa, why did people do that? You know, that feels so weird."So it really is like what we see in our public space is what we find normal in our society. And I don't think it's normal to see murdered animals on billboards. So I think it's very good that that's going to change."Lawyer Hannah Prins wants people to view meat in the same way as they do smokingThe Dutch capital is not starting from scratch.Haarlem, 18km (11 miles) to its west, was in 2022 the first city in the world to announce a broad ban on most meat advertising in public spaces. It came into force in 2024, together with a prohibition on fossil fuel adverts.Utrecht and Nijmegen have since followed with their own measures that explicitly restrict meat (and in Nijmegen's case also dairy) advertising on municipal billboards, on top of existing bans on adverts for fossil fuels, petrol cars and flying.Globally, dozens of cities have, or are moving to, ban fossil-fuel advertising. Such as Edinburgh, Sheffield, Stockholm and Florence. France even has a nationwide ban.Campaigners hope that the Dutch approach - linking meat and fossil fuels - will act as a legal and political blueprint others can copy.Stand at a tram stop in Amsterdam and you might no longer see a juicy burger or a 19 euro ($18.70; £14.90) flight to Berlin on the shelter.Yet the same eye-catching offers can still pop up in your social media algorithm. And, let's face it, many of us would be looking down at our screens until the tram trundles along.If municipal bans leave digital platforms untouched, how much real world impact can they have on our habits or are they purely symbolic virtue-signalling?Getty ImagesIs the ban on outdoor adverts worthwhile if people can still see promotions for meat and fossil fuel online?So far, there is no direct evidence that removing meat advertising from public spaces leads to a shift toward more plant-based societies.However, some researchers are cautiously optimistic, such as Prof Joreintje Mackenbach who is an epidemiologist - a medical professional who investigates health patterns within populations.She describes Amsterdam's move as "a fantastic natural experiment to see"."If we see advertisements for fast food everywhere, it normalizes the consumption of behaviour of fast consumption," says Mackenbach, who is from the Department of Epidemiology and Data Science at hospital Amsterdam University Medical Center."So if we take away those types of cues in our public living environments, then that is also going to have an impact on those social norms."She points to a study which claims that London Underground's 2019 ban on junk food adverts led to less people buying such products in the UK capital.Smiling on the banks of a canal in the centre of Amsterdam, Prins is adamant smaller specialist tradespeople in Amsterdam will benefit from the new advertising ban."Because like everything we love, festivals, nice cheese, a flower shop around the corner. All the stuff that we love, we don't hear from through ads," she says."It's usually through people that we know, or we walk past the building. So I think local businesses will be able to thrive because of this."I think and I hope that big polluting companies will be extra scared. And maybe will rethink the kind of products they are selling. I think you can really see that change is possible."Read more global business stories

※ 著作権に配慮し、引用は冒頭3段落までです。続きは元記事をご覧ください。

元記事を読む ↗