イーロン・マスク氏、OpenAIを支配しようとサム・アルトマン氏をテスラに引き抜こうとした
イーロン・マスク氏は、OpenAIの取締役を辞任する直前、サム・アルトマン氏をテスラ内のAI研究開発チームに招致しようと試みたことが裁判で明らかになった。
マスク氏はアルトマン氏にテスラの取締役の座も提供し、OpenAIをテスラに取り込むことを画策したと伝えられる。
OpenAI側は、マスク氏の行動はOpenAIをコントロールできなかったことへの不満から生じたものであり、競争的なAIラボを立ち上げたことが背景にあると主張している。
この裁判は、OpenAIが非営利団体から利益超過800億ドルの企業へと転換した経緯と関連して、マスク氏がOpenAIを非難している。
イーロン・マスク氏がOpenAIの支配権を巡り、サム・アルトマン氏をテスラに引き抜こうとしていた疑惑が、法廷で浮上しました。マスク氏がOpenAIから退任する以前、テスラ内でアルトマン氏を「世界クラスのAIラボ」に誘い、テスラの取締役席まで提案していたとされるメールや証言が明らかになったのです。
テスラによるOpenAI吸収の試み
マスク氏は、OpenAIの創設者であるアルトマン氏やGreg Brockman氏が、自身が投資した3,800万ドルを元に、8,000億ドル以上の価値を持つ非営利組織を実質的に私物化したと主張しています。この訴訟の中で、マスク氏側は、アルトマン氏の過去の欺瞞的な行動を示す証拠を提示しました。
さらに、2018年2月のマスク氏のOpenAI取締役退任以前の文書から、マスク氏がアルトマン氏をテスラの取締役会に加えることを検討し、その選択肢を提示していたことが示されています。これは、OpenAIをテスラに吸収・腐敗させようとする試みの一部だったと指摘されています。
AIラボ設立に向けた具体的な計画
2017年11月、テスラがNeurIPS AI会議で計画していたイベントに関するFAQの草案が証拠として提出されました。この草案には、「テスラがGoogle/DeepMindやFacebook AI Researchに匹敵する世界的なAIラボを構築している」という記述がありました。
この計画には、マスク氏や元OpenAI研究者のアンドレイ・カルパティ氏がリーダーとして名前が挙がっており、アルトマン氏の名前も疑問符付きで記載されていました。また、アルトマン氏がテスラAIにコミットするための「強制力」となり得るというメモも残されていたことが判明しています。
カルパティ氏の引き抜きを巡る経緯
テスラ社員の証言によると、マスク氏は元OpenAI研究者のカルパティ氏をテスラに引き抜くよう働きかけていたことが明らかになりました。これは、マスク氏が裁判で主張した「カルパティ氏はOpenAIを自主的に退職した」という主張とは矛盾する証言です。
また、マスク氏がGoogle DeepMindのリーダーであるデミス・ハサビス氏をテスラに引き入れる方法を探るシナリオも、マスク氏からZilis氏へのメールに残されていたことが判明しています。これらの証拠は、マスク氏がOpenAIを単に批判するだけでなく、テスラを通じてAI分野の支配力を確立しようとしていたことを示唆しています。
まとめ
今回の法廷での証拠開示は、マスク氏がOpenAIに対して抱いていた支配欲と、テスラを介したAI市場への影響力拡大の意図を浮き彫りにしました。OpenAI側は、マスク氏の動機は単なる「敗北感」から来ていると反論しており、今後の裁判の行方が注目されます。
原文の冒頭を表示(英語・3段落のみ)
A few months before Elon Musk left OpenAI’s board of directors in February 2018, he tried to recruit Sam Altman to join a “world-class AI lab” within Tesla. Musk went as far as offering the OpenAI CEO a Tesla board seat, according to emails and testimony presented in federal court on Wednesday during the Musk v. Altman trial. The emails were shown to a jury during the cross examination of Shivon Zilis, a former OpenAI adviser and board member who is also the mother of four of Musk’s children.Musk’s core claim in this lawsuit is that Altman and OpenAI president Greg Brockman effectively stole a nonprofit, using the $38 million Musk invested to create a private company worth more than $800 billion today. On Wednesday, lawyers for Musk showed video depositions of former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati and former OpenAI board member Helen Toner, to raise concerns over Altman’s alleged history of deceit.OpenAI’s legal team has responded to Musk’s claims by questioning his true motives, arguing that the Tesla CEO has had “sour grapes” ever since he failed to assume control of OpenAI in 2017. He has since started a rival, for-profit AI lab. OpenAI’s lawyers used Zilis’ cross-examination on Wednesday to bring up evidence about Musk’s alleged plans to subvert OpenAI, and tried to suggest Zilis was privy to those plans. As it pertains to this case, one of Zilis’ most important roles at OpenAI was acting as a conduit between Musk and Altman.In a text from February 2018 presented as evidence, Zilis—then an OpenAI adviser, as well as a Neuralink and Tesla executive—asked Altman, “Did you think through a B Corp subsidiary of Tesla?”“There was documentary evidence that, at several points, Mr. Musk had contemplated seeking to join Sam Altman to the board and offered that option,” said OpenAI lawyer William Savitt outside the courthouse on Wednesday. “It was part of Mr. Musk’s effort to corrupt OpenAI and absorb it into Tesla … he was trying to get Altman to abandon the mission and be part of Tesla.”Got a Tip?Are you a current or former OpenAI or Tesla employee who wants to talk about what's happening? We'd like to hear from you. Using a nonwork phone or computer, contact the reporters securely on Signal at Mzeff.88 and Peard33.24.In an email to Tesla’s VP of communications, Sarah O'Brien, from November 2017, Zilis shared a draft of an FAQ page about an event Tesla was planning to hold at the NeurIPS AI conference. “The purpose of this event is to share that Tesla is building a world leading AI lab(?) which will rival the likes of Google / DeepMind and Facebook AI Research,” the drafted FAQ read. The document continues, “One major issue for Tesla is when people think of Elon and AI, they think of OpenAI.”Another part of the FAQ labeled “Who?” lists several Tesla executives who were planned to lead the unit, including Musk and Andrej Karpathy, a former OpenAI researcher. Altman’s name is listed next to Musk’s with two question marks beside it.The FAQ is marked up with notes including that Altman could be a moderator for the NeurIPS event, which "could be a forcing function for Sam to commit to TeslaAI.” Another note reads that Tesla AI's "strategy had yet to be defined and some of it may be deeply proprietary.”Zilis testified on Wednesday that Altman never ended up joining Tesla, and the AI lab and the NeurIPS launch event never came to fruition. She also testified that Musk reached out to Karpathy about recruiting him to Tesla. Savitt told reporters that Zilis’ testimony on Karpathy is “directly contrary to what Mr. Musk told the jury just a few days ago.” Earlier in this trial, Musk testified that Karpathy left OpenAI of his own volition.In text messages from June 2017, Zilis responded “Fuck yeahhhhhhh” when told by Tesla colleagues that Karpathy had signed an official offer. Another employee asked if OpenAI would be mad about Karpathy’s hire, followed by a smiley face emoticon. Zilis said it was a good question, but said she had “talked to Greg [Brockman] today and he clearly had no idea …”It was already known that Musk wanted OpenAI to merge with Tesla, but evidence presented on Wednesday revealed new details about the plans. In an email to another Tesla employee from October 2017, Zilis said that OpenAI’s cofounders had not “internalized the advantages of burying this in Tesla for stealth advantage.” When OpenAI’s lawyers asked Zilis whether “burying” meant Tesla was planning to close-source its AI, she said no. “It’s just a small fish in a big pond,” said Zilis.In another email from Zilis to Musk in February 2018, the same month Musk stepped down from OpenAI’s board, Zilis shared several scenarios about how to create an effective counterbalance to Google DeepMind, which Musk viewed as a major threat. One of the scenarios was having Altman run a Tesla AI lab. Another scenario read, “Find a way to get Demis. Seriously,” referring to the leader of Google DeepMind, Demis Hassabis. “Maybe he comes to Tesla somehow or DeepMind is spun out,” Zilis wrote.Almost two years later, in January 2020, Zilis was appointed to OpenAI’s board of directors. During her time as a board member, Zilis testified that she became pregnant with Musk’s children through IVF, but did not disclose this to the other board members due to a confidentiality agreement she had signed with Musk. When Business Insider reached out to her in 2022, informing Zilis it planned to break a story on the children later that day, Zilis said she called her father, and then Altman.But Zilis continued to serve as an OpenAI board member until February 2023, months before Musk announced the launch of his competing AI lab, xAI. Zilis testified that she resigned after learning about Musk’s effort, allegedly, via a call from Altman. However, texts revealed in the case suggest Zilis already knew about xAI before the call.“Have to resign [from the] openai board btw. [Musk’s] effort has become well known,” Zilis told a friend the day of Altman’s call. “When the father of your babies starts a competitive effort and will recruit out of openai there is nothing to be done.”On Thursday, lawyers for Musk are expected to call Rosie Campbell—a former OpenAI employee and managing director at the AI consciousness nonprofit Eleos AI—as a witness. They’re also expected to call David Schizer, a former dean of Columbia Law School who specializes in nonprofit law.This is an edition of Maxwell Zeff’s Model Behavior newsletter. Read previous newsletters here.
※ 著作権に配慮し、引用は冒頭3段落までです。続きは元記事をご覧ください。