ボットでないことを確認する仕組み
ウェブサイトの管理者は、AI企業による積極的なウェブスクレイピングからサーバーを防衛するため、Anubisというシステムを導入しています。
Anubisは、メールスパム対策と同様のPoW（Proof-of-Work）スキームを利用しています。
この仕組みは、個人の利用では負荷が軽微ですが、大量のスクレイパーが利用する際にはコストを大幅に増加させます。
ただし、現状は暫定的な解決策であり、今後はフォントレンダリングなどの技術を用いてヘッドレスブラウザを識別し、正規ユーザーへの認証提示を減らすことを目標としています。
原文の冒頭を表示（英語・3段落のみ）
Loading...You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone.Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive.Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate.Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.
※ 著作権に配慮し、引用は冒頭3段落までです。続きは元記事をご覧ください。
Hacker News コメント
機械翻訳。HN の元スレッド ↗
Since HN apparently strips out URI fragments I meant to link to this post in the thread (latest post as of writing): https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?t=33442#p273914> And worse yet, I was just now told that CF "provide the troubleshooter as a quality-of-life tool and maintain it with best effort." So they aren't even committed to making it work while that was one of the very things that kept coming up in our meeting as it was the only tool remotely available to be able to test Pale Moon (other than testing internally which they seem unwilling to consider, as well) prior to them pushing things to production, so they are already going back on their promises.> I'm really running out of what little patience I have left with CF. They have effectively not addressed our problems, not provided answers, not told me what behaviour is wrong or broken in Pale Moon (according to them), not provided any tools, and are now playing down the one thing we could use in some fashion as "best effort without commitments", while continuing to be gatekeepers for the Internet and access to large swathes of it. EU's Digital Markets Act is pretty clear about how that is not acceptable behaviour -- even if it was written initially to deal with "preferred bundled software" for operating systems, it does lay the groundwork for addressing unfair practices by other types of gatekeepers like CF.
If your browser crashes it's not the site, it's your browser.